as NICK CHARLES
When analyzing William Powell in The Thin Man, the late great Roger Ebert said that Powell "is to dialogue as Fred Astaire is to dance. His delivery is so droll and insinuating, so knowing and innocent at the same time, that it hardly matters what he's saying."I think this perfectly sums up my own feelings about Powell's work as well. There is a mesmerizing quality to the way Powell speaks--his diction, his tone...all of it drips with intelligence, is assertive yet relaxed all at once, and blends so well with the dark wit that The Thin Man's screenplay offers. He is a perfect leading man in every possible way, and I'd wager that the subsequent five Thin Man sequels spawned not just from the strength of the story or the chemistry of Powell and Myrna Loy, but also because Powell is so good, so in his element, at being a charming sleuth.I've been struggling to evaluate Powell's performance in the days since I've watched The Thin Man. The best parallel I can make for this situation is that of Clark Gable in Gone with the Wind. Both are suave leading men to the nth degree and so inherently charming it hurts. Both play iconic characters as well. But I ask: just how much does embodying the quintessential leading man go into determining just how good a performance actually is? Rhett Butler is arguably just as renown as Scarlett O'Hara, but the former is nowhere near the latter in terms of acclaim and overall acting excellence. I say this because while there's no doubt in my mind that I enjoyed Powell's work, this is a very simple kind of performance that I'm not so sure I would reward with a Best Actor Oscar.
I can't believe that I never saw this movie yet...I really have to!
ReplyDeleteFritz--it's really great! Check it out when you can. I'm still looking forward to your year 1 Best Actress profiles.
DeleteA very late comment, but I'd still like to add that he was nominated three times and no win. I'm biased in his 3rd, which I feel he truly deserved. However, that wasn't the case, but my biggest problem isn't that he lost his three times nominated, it's that he was never honored in any way by the Academy. I would say just his outstanding work in 1936 alone makes him worthy. Who has ever put out that much quality of work in one year? He possibly should have won for The Great Ziegfield had he been nominated for that. Even in Libeled Lady he was award worthy. After the Thin Man was terrific. The man should be honored!!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the reply, and welcome! Shame indeed--there are loads of deserving actors that haven't achieved Oscar glory. But your comment has made me a little more excited to watching him in Life with Father!
Delete